Does hypnosis work? A condition-by-condition scorecard
Where the evidence is strong, where it is mixed, and where it is missing.
What counts as hypnosis?
The American Psychological Association’s Division 30 defines hypnosis as “a state of consciousness involving focused attention and reduced peripheral awareness characterized by an enhanced capacity for response to suggestion.”[1][2] In research, that usually means an induction (a script that narrows attention) followed by suggestions aimed at one goal: less pain, calmer bowels, fewer hot flashes. Whether hypnosis is a real phenomenon at all is a separate question, covered in is hypnosis real?
That matters for the question “does it work?” The trials below tested specific programs for specific problems. A result for one condition does not carry over to another.
How we graded the evidence
We started from a 2024 overview by Rosendahl, Alldredge and Haddenhorst that pulled together 49 meta-analyses covering 261 randomized trials. They found the most solid evidence for patients undergoing medical procedures and patients with pain. They also found a lot of overlap between reviews, and only 9 of the 49 meta-analyses were rated high quality.[2] We then checked the main meta-analysis or guideline for each condition. “Strong” below means repeated randomized trials plus either an active or sham comparison or a guideline recommendation. It does not mean certain.
Where the evidence is strongest
- Medical and surgical procedures. Across 50 trials and 4,269 adults, hypnosis reduced emotional distress (g = 0.55) and pain (g = 0.37) compared with standard care or attention control. The results varied a lot between studies, so a given hospital’s program may do better or worse.[3] More detail: hypnosis for procedure anxiety.
- Irritable bowel syndrome. In a network meta-analysis of 41 trials, gut-directed hypnotherapy and CBT had the largest evidence base and were the most effective over the long term. The authors also rated the risk of bias as high, so the effect is probably overestimated.[4] See our IBS review.
- Menopausal hot flashes. The North American Menopause Society recommends clinical hypnosis at its top evidence level.[5] In a 2025 trial of 250 women, hot flash scores fell 53.4% with six weeks of self-administered hypnosis vs 40.9% with a white-noise sham.[6] See hypnosis for hot flashes and the 2025 audio trial.
Where the evidence is moderate or mixed
- Anxiety. A meta-analysis of 17 trials found a mean effect size of 0.79 against control conditions, a medium to large effect. Hypnosis worked better combined with other psychological treatment than on its own.[9] For anxiety disorders, CBT remains the first-line treatment. See hypnosis for anxiety: the research.
- Chronic pain. In lab pain studies, hypnosis reduced pain ratings for most people.[7] In patients, adding hypnosis to usual care gave a small extra reduction in chronic pain, about 8 points on a 0–100 scale, and the overall certainty of evidence was very low.[8] See our chronic pain review and procedure pain vs chronic pain.
- Weight. Two meta-analyses found large effects against no treatment or usual care. Added to CBT, the extra weight loss was very small at the end of treatment, though larger at follow-up.[2] A later one-year trial in 120 adults with severe obesity found no significant extra weight loss from adding self-hypnosis to standard care.[15] See hypnosis for weight loss.
- Insomnia. Hypnotherapy shortened time to fall asleep compared with a waitlist, but not compared with a sham. Eleven of 13 studies were low quality.[10] CBT-I is still the first-line treatment. See hypnosis for insomnia.
Where the evidence is weak or missing
- Quitting smoking. A Cochrane review of 14 studies and 1,926 people found insufficient evidence that hypnotherapy works better than other behavioral support or quitting unassisted.[11] See hypnosis for smoking.
- Depression. A 2024 review of randomized trials concluded there is not enough evidence that hypnosis reduces the severity of major depression to recommend it.[12]
- Tinnitus. The trials are few, small and old. See hypnosis for tinnitus.
- Recovering memories. Here the evidence points the other way. The American Medical Association found that memories recalled under hypnosis can include confabulations and appear less reliable than normal recall.[13] See is hypnosis safe?
Why does it work better for some people?
People differ in how strongly they respond to suggestion. In a meta-analysis of 85 lab pain studies, hypnosis with direct pain-relief suggestions gave clinically meaningful pain reductions of 42% in highly suggestible people and 29% in moderately suggestible people. Benefits for low scorers were minimal.[7] In patients the link looks weaker. One meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies found suggestibility explained 6% of the variation in outcomes, and its authors questioned whether testing it in clinics is worth it.[14] Other reviews report stronger correlations, up to r = 0.53.[2] We cover what that means for you in why hypnosis works better for some people.
Expectation also plays a part, as it does in most treatments. For that question, read the placebo question nobody wants to answer.
What this means if you want to try it
Match the goal to the evidence. For IBS, hot flashes or a coming procedure, a structured program has real support. For smoking or depression, start with the treatments that have stronger evidence and treat hypnosis as optional. Give it a fair trial: the positive trials used several sessions or weeks of practice, not one listen.
Hypnova is a wellness app that writes personalized hypnosis sessions. None of the studies above tested it, and it is not a treatment for any condition.
Frequently asked questions
Is hypnosis scientifically proven?
For some uses, yes. A 2024 overview of 49 meta-analyses found the most solid evidence for hypnosis during medical procedures and for pain. Gut-directed hypnotherapy for IBS and clinical hypnosis for menopausal hot flashes also have good support. For smoking cessation and depression, reviews say the evidence is not enough to recommend it.
Does hypnosis work on everyone?
No. People differ in how strongly they respond to hypnotic suggestions, and in lab pain studies the benefit was much smaller for people who scored low on suggestibility tests. In clinical studies the link between suggestibility and outcome is weaker, so a low score does not rule out benefit.
Is hypnosis just placebo?
Not entirely. Some trials compared hypnosis with sham or attention-matched controls and still found a difference, for example a 2025 hot flash trial that used a white-noise sham. Expectation still plays a part, as it does in most psychological treatments.
How many sessions does hypnosis take to work?
It depends on the condition. The trials behind the strongest results used structured courses, such as six sessions for IBS or six weeks of home practice for hot flashes. A single session before a procedure can reduce distress, but most longer-term problems were treated over several weeks.
Try a session built around your goal
Hypnova writes and narrates a hypnosis session from a short conversation. 300+ ready-made sessions free to start.
Download freeSources and further reading
- Elkins et al. — Advancing research and practice: the revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2015;63:1–9. Definitions of hypnosis, hypnotic induction, hypnotizability and hypnotherapy. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2014.961870.
- Rosendahl, Alldredge and Haddenhorst — Meta-analytic evidence on the efficacy of hypnosis for mental and somatic health issues: a 20-year perspective
Frontiers in Psychology, 2023;14:1330238 (published January 2024). Overview of 49 meta-analyses of randomized trials published after 2000, with quality ratings and harms. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1330238.
- Holler et al. — Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgical procedures: a meta-analytic update
Clinical Psychology Review, 2021;85:102001. 50 randomized trials, 4,269 patients, hypnosis vs standard care or attention control. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102001.
- Black et al. — Efficacy of psychological therapies for irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and network meta-analysis
Gut, 2020;69:1441–1451. 41 randomized trials, 4,072 participants; relative risk of remaining symptomatic. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321191.
- The North American Menopause Society — The 2023 nonhormone therapy position statement
Menopause, 2023;30:573–590. Evidence levels for nonhormone treatments of vasomotor symptoms. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002200.
- Elkins et al. — Self-administered hypnosis vs sham hypnosis for hot flashes: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA Network Open, 2025;8:e2542537. 250 postmenopausal women; six weeks of self-administered hypnosis vs a white-noise sham. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.42537.
- Thompson et al. — The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019;99:298–310. Lab-induced pain in healthy volunteers, hypnosis vs no-intervention control. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.013.
- Jones et al. — Adjunctive use of hypnosis for clinical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pain Reports, 2024;9:e1185. 70 randomized trials (n = 6,078) of hypnosis added to another treatment vs that treatment alone. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001185.
- Valentine et al. — The efficacy of hypnosis as a treatment for anxiety: a meta-analysis
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2019;67:336–363. 15 studies, 17 trials of hypnosis vs control conditions. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2019.1613863.
- Lam et al. — Hypnotherapy for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2015;23:719–732. 13 trials, 502 participants; comparisons with waitlist and sham. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.07.011.
- Barnes et al. — Hypnotherapy for smoking cessation (Cochrane review)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019;6:CD001008. 14 studies, 1,926 participants; quit rates at six months or longer. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001008.pub3.
- Souza et al. — Hypnosis for depression: systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2024;57:101913. Randomized trials in adults with major depressive disorder, graded with GRADE. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913.
- AMA Council on Scientific Affairs — Scientific status of refreshing recollection by the use of hypnosis
JAMA, 1985;253:1918–1923. Review of hypnosis for memory recall in legal settings.
- Montgomery, Schnur and David — The impact of hypnotic suggestibility in clinical care settings
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2011;59:294–309. Meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies (283 participants) relating suggestibility to hypnosis outcomes. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2011.570656.
- Bo et al. — Effects of self-conditioning techniques (self-hypnosis) in promoting weight loss in patients with severe obesity: a randomized controlled trial
Obesity, 2018;26:1422–1429. 120 adults with severe obesity; standard care with or without self-hypnosis training, one-year weight change. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22262.
Evidence checked September 19, 2026. This is an editorial research summary by the Hypnova team, not a systematic review or a clinical assessment. Cited studies evaluate their own interventions; they do not establish that Hypnova produces the same outcomes. This article is educational and does not replace individualized care.
Keep reading
App or therapist? A new IBS trial compared hypnotherapy both ways
A 2026 trial in Gut compared in-person hypnotherapy, a self-guided smartphone program, and online education for IBS. Here are the results and their limits.
Self-hypnosis audio for hot flashes: what a 250-woman trial found
A 2025 JAMA Network Open trial tested self-hypnosis audio against a sham for menopausal hot flashes. What it found, how big the effect was, and its limits.
Hypnosis helped with procedure pain, not chronic pain, in a new review
A 2025 meta-analysis of 12 trials found hypnosis reduced pain and opioid use around procedures but not chronic pain. What that means and where it falls short.